Supermodel Rachel Hunter has expressed her political views as referenced in this story. She states, “Clinton had a lot of tea parties with celebrities, but [right after] his term, somebody flew two planes into the Twin Towers. What do you want – somebody who keeps your children safe or somebody who throws nice tea parties?”
Good for her, I love it when famous people turn out to be Republican. What I don’t get is the opening paragraph of the story: “Aging rocker Rod Stewart’s ex-wife, Rachel Hunter, has controversially slammed former President Bill Clinton and praised President George W. Bush.” Why is that when someone comes out in support of Bush, it’s “controversial?” I’ll bet that if she had said that George Bush was an idiot and she wished that Clinton was still in office, that would be just fine. Of course that would sum up the opinion of the vast (left-wing conspiracy?) majority of journalists out there. If your opinion is consistent with theirs, then you’re perfectly welcome to say whatever you want, since they all know more than the rest of us do, anyway.
Could there be left-wing bias in the media? No, impossible, I must be just reading too deep into the story.
Recent Comments